Increasing community engagement to tackle wildlife crime in Murchison Falls National Park

Current initiative

Published September 2020

The project Park action plans: increasing community engagement in tackling wildlife crime’ aims to address the factors leading to wildlife crime in Murchison Falls National Park (Uganda), to promote community engagement as an important complement to law enforcement, and to build the institutional capacity of the Uganda Wildlife Authority’s (UWA) Community Conservation Unit.

Lead

IIED Logo

Location

Murchison Falls National Park is the largest national park in Uganda.

The poaching and wildlife trade problem

Species affected African Elephant Loxodonta africana , Lion Panthera leo , Pangolins

Products in trade

Ivory, pangolin scales and meat, and lion products (such as bone or pelts) for international markets.

Overview of the problem

In MFNP the majority of species are caught for bushmeat markets, although there is also evidence of opportunistic poaching of high value species, such as elephants, lions and pangolins. Previous IIED-led research has shown the key drivers of poaching to be poverty, human-wildlife conflict (HWC) and a lack of income earning opportunities. This research indicated that mitigating HWC, establishing wildlife scouts and developing enterprise for income generation had the greatest potential to reduce wildlife crime.

In addition, there are poor relations between UWA and local communities surrounding MFNP.

The anti-IWT initiative

This project has two main components:

1) Implement community engagement programmes based on 5-year, multi-stakeholder park-level action plans, developed as a final output from a previous IIED-led project in Uganda.

Support existing community-based wildlife scout programmes by establishing new community enterprises to generate non-poaching income and to complement HWC mitigation activities, such as beekeeping to both deter crop-raiding and provide income. These enterprise programmes will be implemented in HWC and IWT hotspots, where HWC mitigation programmes need improving. Ex-poachers will also be targeted where possible.

Activities include supporting households with mentoring, training, micro-grants and saving groups, with the aim of empowering people to sustain their business in the future.  

 

2) Build institutional capacity of UWA’s Community Conservation Unit to support the plans and increase its recognition within UWA HQ as an effective, strategic and necessary complement to law enforcement efforts.

Inclusion of gender, age and ethnic groups

Due to entrenched cultural norms, wildlife scouts are considered a male-only job. To include women in the project, enterprise development is targeted at women from households involved in scout programmes.

The strategy

Strengthening disincentives for illegal behaviour

Un-paid (voluntary) community scouts
Paid in-kind community scouts
Further detail

The wildlife scout programme is made up of community volunteers, who protect crops and livestock from wildlife in the park. Training and equipment is provided to the scouts.

Decreasing the costs of living with wildlife

Preventive measures to deter wildlife
Reactive measures to deal with problem animals
Further detail

Increasing the capacity of wildlife scouts to mitigate and respond to HWC.

Implementing bee and chilli approaches to deter elephants from crop raiding.

Increasing livelihoods that are not related to wildlife

(Non-wildlife-based) enterprise development/support
Further detail

Many wildlife scouts at MFNP don’t receive any livelihood support. These scouts will be targeted for enterprise support, reaching at least 180 households through the development of 60 micro-businesses.

Has the initiative made a difference?

At the mid-way point of the project over 100 businesses had begun growing and selling non-palatable crops. Communities have been involved throughout, from project selection, and selling their produce at markets, to setting up savings groups. Enterprises have so far improved livelihoods and have been very positively received by communities.

Although a formal evaluation of changes to wildlife crime hasn’t yet been undertaken, anecdotal evidence shows that enterprise development has provided poachers with an alternative source of income.

Organisers, donors and partners

Project partners are IIED, Village Enterprise, Wildlife Conservation Society, Uganda Wildlife Authority and the Uganda Conservation Foundation.

The project IWT036 “Implementing park action plans for community engagement to tackle IWT” is funded by the UK Government’s Illegal Wildlife Trade Challenge Fund.

For further information contact (peoplenotpoaching@gmail.com).